El Dr. Peter McCullough – Termina la pandemia con 5 hechos de COVID
- El virus no se propaga de forma asintomática.
- Nunca debemos hacer pruebas a personas asintomáticas.
- La inmunidad natural es robusta, completa y duradera.
- COVID-19 se puede tratar fácilmente en casa.
- Las vacunas actuales son obsoletas, inseguras y no aptas para uso humano.
El eminente médico estadounidense, el profesor Peter McCullough (cardiólogo, internista e investigador), ha preparado lo que él llama «cinco mensajes clave de verdad científica que quiero que todos comprendan sobre el virus y la pandemia». Tiene todo el respaldo científico necesario para respaldar sus afirmaciones.
1. El virus no se propaga de forma asintomática. Es decir, solo las personas enfermas se lo pasan a otras personas.
2. Deberíamos dejar de hacer pruebas a personas asintomáticas. Eso solo genera falsos positivos, creando ‘casos’ adicionales y preocupaciones adicionales. ‘No debería haber una sola persona en la Tierra…
Ver la entrada original 1.724 palabras más
RAMROCK'S BLOG 
I placed this on the page you Re-Blogged as well.
Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects about the risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcp.13795
«Study Results.
COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were unvaccinated. Vaccines against SARS, MERS, and RSV have never been approved, and data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest serious mechanistic concern: That empirically designed vaccines using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralizing antibodies), whether composed of proteins, viral vectors, DNA or RNA and regardless of the method of administration, may worsen COVID-19 disease through antibody-dependent potentiation (ADE). This risk is sufficiently hidden in the clinical trial protocols and consent forms of the ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that patients are unlikely to adequately understand this risk, precluding truly informed consent of subjects in these trials.
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications.
The specific and significant ADE risk of COVID-19 should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as to those being recruited for trials and to future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient understanding for informed consent.»
I am not a physician, but I know how to read the medical literature well enough to realize that there is a problem. I think this may be the reason for the variant claim, i.e., they know that vaccinated people are likely to get sick, possibly worse than unvaccinated people, and they want to have a narrative to cover it.
Me gustaLe gusta a 1 persona